Skip to main content

As Congress sleeps, military awakens to the energy/climate threat

Steven Weissman, associate director, Center for Law, Energy and the Environment | July 29, 2010

The heat wave that has smothered the Eastern seaboard like a heavy, sweaty blanket has apparently done nothing to inspire the U.S. Senate to pass a climate bill, or take major steps on the energy front. Insiders report that Harry Reid’s “stripped down” energy bill will not only dodge the climate debate, but it will also fail to propose a renewable energy standard for the nation’s electric utilities. Reid reportedly says that he just can’t find the 60 votes needed to get the job done.  In the meantime, the nation’s military establishment is pushing aggressively to promote renewable energy development on its own facilities.

PentagonIt was so hot in Washington D.C., during a recent visit, that spending a day walking the air-conditioned halls of the Pentagon was a great relief. I was invited there to talk about energy regulation, and about 40 attorneys from the Department of Defense and the various branches of the military showed up — to listen and to talk.  The questions were insightful and evidence of active engagement in developing renewable energy was strong.

Green energy is big business in the military these days. It offers both strategic value and environmental benefits.  First, there is the inevitable link of energy dependency to global conflict.  As Paul Roberts wrote in this 2004 book The End of Oil, “Inevitably, as oil became inseparably tied to diplomacy, it became inseparably linked with war as well.  Not only did industrialized nations need oil to wage war (the modern army is now a ‘mechanized’ force, with tanks, ships, and planes), but countries increasingly went to war for oil.”  In recent years, military strategist have also come to recognize the role that energy efficiency and green power can have in protecting troops. Greater efficiency means fewer fuel convoys, which are such inviting targets for roadside bombers.  Green power offers the enhanced reliability that comes from fuel diversity.

Congress recognized these benefits in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which imposed no renewable energy requirements on the regulated utilities, but required power serving the military to reach 7.5% renewable content by 2013.  The Army and Navy voluntarily upped the ante by pledging to be 25% renewable by 2020. Congress then adopted the 25% requirement in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2007 (10 U.S.C.S. Section 2911(e)).

Although the ambitious renewable energy standard for the military was a bipartisan effort by Congress (it passed the Senate by unanimous consent), the same institution seems unable to adopt even a watered-down renewable content standard for the rest of the nation.   What is the difference?  Strong opposition to the national standard from electric utilities – especially those in states that appear less well-endowed with renewable resources.  So, as the Senate refuses to vote out a national renewable energy standard, it’s not that the individual members don’t “get it”.  More than anything else, it’s that certain powerful electric utilities don’t want it.

Cross-posted from the Legal Planet.

Comments to “As Congress sleeps, military awakens to the energy/climate threat

  1. Nothing proves that our system of education has failed more than the failure of the “U.S. Senate to pass a climate bill, or take major steps on the energy front.”

    It is time for Berkeley to lead the way to guarantee an acceptable quality of life for the long term future of humanity this year.

    Never before have every single political, social, economic and scientific institution failed to achieve this goal even though history is littered with the ruins of civilizations that have failed to do so.

    But there is a major difference today, we have Berkeley professors and scholars with their unlimited wealth of creative minds to lead institutional leaders in meeting the challenges of change that threaten the survival of the human race more than ever before.

    Or am I wrong?

    • Considering what Earth is facing as the Keeling Curve continues to accelerate exponentially, I wonder if this scenario is the same one that got Mars into trouble, when the University of Mars failed develop fusion energy that could have saved Mars from Global Warming Tipping Points.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *