Energy & Environment

Gina McCarthy to be nominated as EPA head

Holly Doremus

As predicted by Cara Horowitz recently, it’s being widely reported (for example here) this morning (March 4) that Gina McCarthy, currently EPA’s Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation, is Obama’s pick to succeed Lisa Jackson as EPA Administrator.

Cara sees this appointment as a good thing for EPA’s climate policy efforts and efforts to work with states like California, which of course is playing its own important role in climate policy. I agree. I would just add that I think it says a couple of things about the administration’s priorities for environmental policy in its second term.

Gina McCarthyFirst, it’s a stay-the-course appointment. McCarthy has headed up EPA’s air pollution regulation division for the past four years, and air pollution (both conventional and greenhouse gas versions) has been the agency’s clear focus. EPA has had, and will have, its hands full with air pollution issues, particularly with figuring out how the Clean Air Act must, can, and should be used to combat greenhouse gas pollution.

McCarthy is well positioned to lead that effort. She knows the relevant laws, institutions, and players well. But she won’t forget that the Clean Air Act deals with much more than climate change; her background is as a public health advocate.

Second, she’s a pragmatist, interested in outcomes rather than how they are achieved. She has been a chief architect of the administration’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, which was designed to improve air quality at relatively low cost by allowing “air-quality assured trading” (EPA’s term) in the eastern half of the country. That rule, which followed on a Bush administration trading initiative that didn’t survive judicial review, was itself struck down by the D.C. Circuit as inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. Although that rule didn’t survive, it indicated the agency’s (and presumably McCarthy’s) willingness to think creatively and use all the tools at its disposal to try to achieve its goals, in this case dealing with the persistent and difficult problem of interstate air pollution. She’ll need that kind of creativity going forward, and a more sympathetic D.C. Circuit wouldn’t hurt either.

This appointment makes all kinds of sense at the current political moment — McCarthy is an insider who knows how to work the system and understands the kinds of opposition she will be dealing with in Congress and some states.

If there’s a downside to it, it is that it will reinforce the agency’s existing emphases on air pollution and on public health. I’ve been frustrated with the lack of progress on water issues in the first Obama term, and I’ve been frustrated for some time with the minimal attention paid by the EPA (despite its name) to environmental harm as opposed to human health impacts.

But even I don’t think it would be a viable strategy to put aggressive ecosystem protection front and center right now.

Cross-posted from the environmental law and policy blog Legal Planet.

Bookmark and Share
Comment to "Gina McCarthy to be nominated as EPA head":
    • Anthony St. John '63

      I have gained 50 years of most valuable experience with life on earth since graduating from Cal.

      The number one most important fact of life that I have learned since graduation is that the human race shall continue to be in increasingly grave jeopardy as long as we continue to allow amygdala dominated males to continue to subjugate females in all countries and institutions like they do today.

      Males have a continuous record of failure to protect humanity and the biosphere during the entire history of our civilization, and time is most certainly running out for the most dangerous species in the history of planet earth.

      Our universities are our last line of defense, and as long as we continue to allow men marginalize women there can be no hope.

      Preeminent Berkeley professors and scholars have one last chance to meet the challenges of change we are most gravely threatened by today or there can be no hope to perpetuate acceptable quality of life for our newest and future generations.

      It’s up to you folks, don’t say you weren’t warned!

      [Report abuse]

Leave a comment

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


+ 4 = 12