Skip to main content

Detroit’s water crisis: The flood of inequity

Rasheed Shabazz, former communications fellow, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society | July 29, 2014

Declaring “Water is a Human Right,” hundreds marched in the streets of Detroit on July 18 to protest the city shutting off water services for thousands of residents too poor to pay their utility bills.

Since March of this year, the Detroit Sewage and Water Department (DSWD) has cut off running water to over 15,000 homes, including over 7,000 families during the month of June alone. A third of the city’s $18 billion debt is due to DSWD. The collection of about $6 million in unpaid bills is the city’s solution.

Over 100,000 disproportionately poor people of color are at risk of losing water in their homes for bills over $150 or considered delinquent for over six months. Over 82 percent of Detroiters, and nearly one in four of all city residents, are Black.

detroit water protestThe shutoffs violate human rights, according to a United Nations panel. Last week, nurses declared the shutoffs a public health emergency. One lawsuit claims the cutoffs are racially motivated. The federal bankruptcy judge said the water crisis further damages the city’s reputation and may stall economic recovery efforts following Detroit’s recent bankruptcy.

Detroit’s Water Crisis’ origins go beyond bankruptcy and municipal finance, and its solutions will require empowering city residents, developing dense networks dedicated to identifying and implementing complex solutions and forward thinking that’s deeper than the Great Lakes. This will all require unthinking the current narrative of the water shutoffs, Detroit’s bankruptcy and how Motown got to where it is today.

“The mainstream discussion should reflect the reality of connections between the status of distressed cities and the housing crisis, the culpability of investment actors, and the associated consequences on municipal budgets, metropolitan regions’ concentrated poverty and racial dynamics.”

The “Origins of the Urban Crisis” experienced by Detroit and other post-industrial cities lies in the context of structural inequalities created by deindustrialization, racial residential segregation and the postwar regional battles between the declining chocolate cities and their growing vanilla suburbs.

The first wave of the current crisis facing cities began with the subprime loan crisis, when banks targeted communities of color with predatory loans. This predatory lending by big banks created the foreclosure epidemic and led to the loss of wealth among Black and Brown families and entire communities redlined all over (again). In many cities, the communities redlined during and after World War II are the same that experienced predatory loans and the foreclosure epidemic. And, many struggling homeowners are still underwater today, despite talks of a housing recovery.

These predatory loans and foreclosures devastated financing for local and state governments, as property taxes are those jurisdictions’ largest revenue sources.

Last week’s protest occurred a year to the day after Detroit filed for bankruptcy. But as a recent Haas Institute convening notes, to adequately address Detroit’s issues, we have to go Beyond Bankruptcy. Over three dozen cities in the U.S. have declared bankruptcy since 2008. Detroit is the largest. The Beyond Bankruptcy: Building Power and Resilience project’s vision calls for reframing the narrative around cities in distress:

“The mainstream discussion should reflect the reality of connections between the status of distressed cities and the housing crisis, the culpability of investment actors, and the associated consequences on municipal budgets, metropolitan regions’ concentrated poverty and racial dynamics.”

Yet the narrative around Detroit’s bankruptcy and the water crisis reflect racial and economic antagonism against Blacks and poor people. “They should’ve paid their bill” is one common response, despite the exorbitant rate increases faced by the many un- and underemployed. And a recent “investigative” news story focused on the “scammers” illegally “cashing in” on the crisis by restoring access for residents whose water was shut off. This story feeds into stereotypes criminalizing poor, Black people, instead of focusing on the culprits who caused the crisis.

Since March 2013, Detroit has been under state-imposed emergency management, appointed by a white, Republican governor. In addition to being predominantly Black, over 93 percent of Detroit’s residents voted for Governor Rick Snyder’s Democratic opponents in 2010. Most residents also oppose emergency management. This scenario undermines democracy and disenfranchises the city’s voters.

protestersMany activists criticize the governor and his handpicked manager as puppets of the Wall Street speculators who created, and continue to profit from, the foreclosure crisis. Pointing to efforts to privatize the city’s parking system, transportation department, schools, paramedics, Belle Isle, and even the private contractor shutting off people’s water, the recent shutoffs are just a part of a larger plan to steal the people’s assets and privatize natural resources, like the Great Lakes, the largest group of freshwater lakes on our planet.

The recent water crisis is due to systematic inequality. The current narrative that suggests Detroit’s residents are corrupt, criminal, greedy, incompetent or lazy is an injustice to the hardworking people of Detroit. Enabled by this narrative, the state’s imposition of the Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr undermines democracy and disempowers the people. Solutions require the inclusion of the people.

After Detroit’s emergency manager Kevin Orr announced funding and programs available to help residents whose water was shut off the day of the protest, on July 21, DWSD announced a two-week moratorium on water shutoffs. However, city crews will still check for water turned back on illegally during the ‘moratorium’. This temporary stop-gap does nothing to solve the city’s long-term challenges. The structural adjustment program offered by Orr is unacceptable and will not develop the capacity of the people of Detroit. Privatization as a solution is an illusion. And while well-intentioned, crowdsourcing to pay residents’ delinquent bills does not address the sources of this crisis.

The good news is the following: This attack on the fundamental right to water has galvanized activists, bringing together nurses, environmentalists, unions, retirees, welfare rights advocates, foreclosure defense activists and community groups. At the same time as last week’s protest, nine people were arrested for blockading the private contractors trucks scheduled to cut off people’s water. Wandering through the wilderness of post-industrial Detroit, they are standing up to Pharoah, demanding he let the people’s water flow. This alliance can build the community-power needed to enable lasting solutions–like the People’s Plan for Restructuring Toward a Sustainable Detroit – for the people, by the people.

We must shift the narrative beyond the tides of this current crisis. Instead of focusing on so-called scammers “illegally” hooking water for money, or blaming “greedy” retirees, attention must be paid to structural inequalities fueled by banks, driven by undemocratically positioned officials and enabled by the road laid down by policies.

The philosophy held by state officials that holds them superior to Detroiters must be finally and permanently discredited, along with the ideology that residents are unable to govern themselves because they are too poor, too Black or too ignorant. The metropolitan system of first class suburbs and second-class city-citizenship must be abandoned in favor of regional equity. Neither a person’s skin color nor her or his zip code should determine whether she or he has access to water.

Cross-posted from the Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society website

Comments to “Detroit’s water crisis: The flood of inequity

  1. access to water a basic human right, yea.
    a right to indoor plumbing, nay.
    Who pays for waste-water treatment? Paying water utility customers, that’s who. I have never heard of people protesting to have their waste treated. Maybe if they carried their water from the river or that huge lake they would. Lots of people carry water. I have and more than one guy I work with has.

    • I carried water in Tanzania. It’s hard work. Too many people on our planet lack the basic access that most U.S. dwellers take for granted. Water shortages, power outages, the loss of ‘basic’ utilities. Never thought it could happen here.

      So, your solution is having Detroit residents fetch their water from the Great Lakes. Let the people in the suburbs get their buckets and pails and go first. While they’re at it, how about making the owners of the golf course or other commercial businessesthat have been delinquent on their bills carry water. Or nah?

      Afrikan people today. You tomorrow. Detroit today. Your city tomorrow.

      As Fannie Lou asked, “Is this America?”

      • My solution is: anybody not paying their bill in a timely matter, whether golf course or inner city resident, should not continue to receive the service thus putting a strain on the system and affecting the people who pay their bills. Any one not willing to pay their water bills should be willing to carry water from the lakes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *