<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Berkeley Blog &#187; George Lakoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/author/glakoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu</link>
	<description>Provocative thinking from UC Berkeley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why it’s hard to replace the &#8216;fiscal cliff&#8217; metaphor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/12/04/why-its-hard-to-replace-the-fiscal-cliff-metaphor/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/12/04/why-its-hard-to-replace-the-fiscal-cliff-metaphor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistic metaphors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Writers on economics have been talking since the election about why the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; metaphor is misleading. Alternative metaphors have been offered like the fiscal hill, fiscal curb, and fiscal showdown, as if one metaphor could easily be replaced by another that makes more sense of the real situation. But none of the alternatives has stuck, nor has the fiscal cliff metaphor been abandoned. Why? Why do some metaphors have far more staying power than others, even when they give a misleading picture of a crucial national issue?</p>
<p>The reason has to do with the way that metaphorical thought and language ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/12/04/why-its-hard-to-replace-the-fiscal-cliff-metaphor/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/12/04/why-its-hard-to-replace-the-fiscal-cliff-metaphor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming systemically caused Hurricane Sandy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/11/05/global-warming-systemically-caused-hurricane-sandy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/11/05/global-warming-systemically-caused-hurricane-sandy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy & Environment: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, global warming systemically caused Hurricane Sandy &#8212; and the Midwest droughts and the fires in Colorado and Texas, as well as other extreme weather disasters around the world. Let&#8217;s say it out loud, it was causation, systemic causation.</p>
<p>Systemic causation is familiar. Smoking is a systemic cause of lung cancer. HIV is a systemic cause of AIDS. Working in coal mines is a systemic cause of black lung disease. Driving while drunk is a systemic cause of auto accidents. Sex without contraception is a systemic cause of unwanted pregnancies. There is a difference between systemic and direct causation. Punching someone ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/11/05/global-warming-systemically-caused-hurricane-sandy/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/11/05/global-warming-systemically-caused-hurricane-sandy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama lost the first debate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/10/05/why-obama-lost-the-first-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/10/05/why-obama-lost-the-first-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You don’t win a presidential debate by being a policy wonk. Obama violated all the basics of presidential debating.  The best defense is a good offense. You have to set the terms of the debate and press those terms. Obama failed. Here are those basics:</p>

State your moral values. Contrast them with your opponent’s.
Project empathy and enthusiasm. Connect.
Communicate clearly and simply.
Be authentic. Say just what you believe.
Project trust.
Present an authentic view of yourself that the public can identify with and be proud of.

<p>Obama did none of this.  Instead he talked about policy details.</p>
<p>He needed to come on strong from the first ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/10/05/why-obama-lost-the-first-debate/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/10/05/why-obama-lost-the-first-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney, Ryan, and the Devil’s budget: Will America keep its soul?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/23/romney-ryan-and-the-devils-budget-will-america-keep-its-soul/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/23/romney-ryan-and-the-devils-budget-will-america-keep-its-soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American individualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney-Ryan budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Coauthored with Glenn Smith</p>
<p>America was born with a great soul, a moral view of Democracy in which citizens care about their fellow citizens and join together to take responsibility not just for themselves but for each other, for America as a union, a joint enterprise. The government’s job was to carry out that moral vision and to do so it created what we call The Public, the provision of basic protection and empowerment for all.</p>
<p>From the beginning of America, the Public provided roads and bridges, public schools, hospitals, a national bank, a patent office, police, a justice system, public buildings ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/23/romney-ryan-and-the-devils-budget-will-america-keep-its-soul/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/23/romney-ryan-and-the-devils-budget-will-america-keep-its-soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama defends freedom of religion: Be not afraid of Mitt Romney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/14/obama-defends-freedom-of-religion-be-not-afraid-of-mitt-romney/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/14/obama-defends-freedom-of-religion-be-not-afraid-of-mitt-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Coauthored with Elisabeth Wehling</p>
<p>Do you believe in freedom of religion? President Obama does, and he is defending Americans&#8217; freedom of religion against Mitt Romney and Fox News in the administration of his health care bill.</p>
<p>The president allows each woman to decide for herself whether or not to ask her insurance company to cover contraception. If this violates a woman&#8217;s religious principles, she would never ask. A woman would make such a request only if contraception fit her principles. In short, the president has guaranteed that each woman can act according to her religious principles. He has made a strong defense ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/14/obama-defends-freedom-of-religion-be-not-afraid-of-mitt-romney/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/14/obama-defends-freedom-of-religion-be-not-afraid-of-mitt-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s and Romney&#8217;s opposed visions for a free America</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/01/obamas-and-romneys-opposed-visions-for-a-free-america/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/01/obamas-and-romneys-opposed-visions-for-a-free-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Co-authored with Elisabeth Wehling</p>
<p>America is divided about its future. Should it keep and expand the system that brought past opportunity, prosperity and freedom? Or should it dismantle that system?</p>
<p>President Obama recently reminded us that private life, private enterprise, and personal freedom depend on what the public provides.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Internet didn&#8217;t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet. (&#8230;) when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together. There are some things, just like fighting fires, we don&#8217;t do on ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/01/obamas-and-romneys-opposed-visions-for-a-free-america/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/08/01/obamas-and-romneys-opposed-visions-for-a-free-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What hath Roberts wrought?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/07/06/what-hath-roberts-wrought/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/07/06/what-hath-roberts-wrought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 23:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=10193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Co-authored with Elisabeth Wehling</p>
<p>Democrats all over America are claiming victory in the Chief Justice Roberts&#8217; vote to uphold the constitutionality of the President&#8217;s health care law. Conservatives all over America are campaigning all the harder for a president and a congress that will overthrow the law in the future.</p>
<p>Thomas Friedman in his New York Times column praises Roberts to skies for putting the country ahead of ideology. Others have seen Roberts as saving &#8220;his court&#8221; from the appearance of ideological control.</p>
<p>But Roberts is a conservative, and a very smart, forward-looking one at that. What Roberts accomplished on one issue was ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/07/06/what-hath-roberts-wrought/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/07/06/what-hath-roberts-wrought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words that don’t work</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/12/words-that-don%e2%80%99t-work/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/12/words-that-don%e2%80%99t-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=8740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Progressives had some fun recently with Frank Luntz, who told the Republican Governors’ Association that he was scared to death of the Occupy movement and recommended language to combat what the movement had achieved. But the progressive critics mostly just laughed, said his language wouldn’t work, and assumed that if Luntz was scared, everything was hunky-dory.  Just keep on saying the words Luntz doesn’t like: capitalism, tax the rich, etc.</p>
<p>It’s a trap.</p>
<p>When Luntz says he is “scared to death,” he means that the Republicans who hire him are scared to death and he can profit from that fear by offering ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/12/words-that-don%e2%80%99t-work/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/12/words-that-don%e2%80%99t-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy elections, with a simple message</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/01/occupy-elections-with-a-simple-message/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/01/occupy-elections-with-a-simple-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=8594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What’s next? That’s the question being asked as cities close down Occupy encampments and winter approaches.</p>
<p>The answer is simple. Just as the Tea Party gained power, the Occupy Movement can. The Occupy movement has raised awareness of a great many of America’s real issues and has organized supporters across the country. Next comes electoral power. Wall Street exerts its force through the money that buys elections and elected officials. But ultimately, the outcome of elections depends on people willing to take to the streets — registering voters, knocking on doors, distributing information, speaking in local venues. The way to change ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/01/occupy-elections-with-a-simple-message/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/12/01/occupy-elections-with-a-simple-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to frame yourself: A framing memo for Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/10/25/how-to-frame-yourself-a-framing-memo-for-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/10/25/how-to-frame-yourself-a-framing-memo-for-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Lakoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Law: What's on your mind?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral framing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.berkeley.edu/?p=8149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was asked weeks ago by some in the Occupy Wall Street movement to  make suggestions for how to frame the movement. I have hesitated so far,  because I think the movement should be framing itself. It&#8217;s a general  principle: Unless you frame yourself, others will frame you — the  media, your enemies, your competitors, your well-meaning friends. I have  so far hesitated to offer suggestions. But the movement appears to  maturing and entering a critical time when small framing errors could  have large negative consequences. So I thought it might be helpful ... <a href="http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/10/25/how-to-frame-yourself-a-framing-memo-for-occupy-wall-street/">More ></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2011/10/25/how-to-frame-yourself-a-framing-memo-for-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
