Skip to main content

Class of 1957-Garff B. Wilson Professor of Economics Christina Romer on why the recession was so large

Brad DeLong, professor of economics | September 3, 2010

Another long and very interesting quotation from Class of 1957-Garff B. Wilson Professor of Economics Christina Romer’s final speech as a cabinet-rank member of the Obama administration, at the National Press Club on September 1, 2010:

This passage explains why our current recession is so much worse and dire than any other post-World War II recession has been.

Class of 1957-Garff B. Wilson Professor of Economics Christina D. Romer:

The current recession has been fundamentally different from other postwar recessions. This is not my father’s recession. Rather than being caused by deliberate monetary policy actions, it began with interest rates at low levels. It is a recession born of regulatory failures and unsound practices that contributed to a housing bubble and eventually a full-fledged financial crisis. Precisely what has made it so terrifying and so difficult to cure is that we have been in largely uncharted territory. An all-out financial meltdown in the world’s largest economy and the center of the world’s financial system is something the world has experienced only once in the past century — in the 1930s. Thus, the President took office in the midst of a recession of historic proportions, but for which history provided little guidance….

[E]ven before the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, the U.S. economy had lost over a million and a half jobs and GDP had fallen by more than the average in the previous two recessions. But the worst was yet to come. By the fall of 2008, investors had woken up to the now-obvious reality that slicing and dicing mortgages into mortgage-backed securities and other instruments didn’t reduce the aggregate risk associated with investment in housing. As declines in house prices accelerated, fears about the solvency of firms holding mortgage-backed securities set off a genuine financial panic. The collapse of Lehman sent credit spreads skyrocketing and credit availability plummeting. Had the Federal Reserve not responded as rapidly and creatively as it did, the crisis would have been catastrophic. As it was, it was as severe as anything we have experienced since the Great Depression.

Though it was clear that the strain on our financial markets was intense, what was not clear at the time was how quickly and strongly the financial crisis would affect the economy. Precisely because such severe financial shocks have been rare, there were no reliable estimates of the likely impact. To this day, economists don’t fully understand why firms cut production as much as they did, and why they cut labor so much more than they normally would, given the decline in output…. Even our statistical agencies appear to have been surprised. The advance estimate of GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2008 was a decline of 3.8 percent (at an annual rate). The most recent estimate is nearly double that, a drop of 6.8 percent. Likewise, the first estimates of job losses in the last five months of 2008 turned out to be more than a million jobs smaller than the final estimates. The other development that few anticipated was the degree to which the recession would be worldwide….

Despite the fact that we were in uncharted territory, the new economics team back in December 2008 was painfully aware that the economy was facing a terrible downturn and that we were fast approaching the edge of a cliff. At a meeting we had with the President-Elect in Chicago in mid-December, I began by saying: “The economy is very weak and deteriorating fast.” The weekend before the meeting, the team had sent a memo to Rahm Emanuel echoing this sentiment and laying the groundwork for a larger stimulus package. Whereas most analysts and Congressional policymakers had been contemplating a stimulus of $500 billion or less, we urged that it grow substantially because of the severity of the downturn…

Comments to “Class of 1957-Garff B. Wilson Professor of Economics Christina Romer on why the recession was so large

  1. I have little education but so far your recommendations of a stimulus plan are far of the mark hoped for. This whole mess started so long ago based on a idealistic view of everyone deserves a home. And with the help of different administrations this went forward right or wrong. The best, yet most unwanted direction should have been to “let the forest burn to the ground”. The pain would have been immense but then over. Now we are talking about round 2 of the stimulus. Like a broken rotary watches we want to work, we think putting new battery’s in the watch it will magically heal itself. It does not work that way.

  2. Wow the fed has over 200 Phd economist using differential equations but they still get everything wrong. economist = wanna be physicist.

  3. This financial and economic collapse was created on purpose and I think most of us know that. The fed doesn’t want America to prosper, they want to collapse the economy to bring in new global regulations, and eventually global governance. They let a few banks go under (Lehman Brothers, etc) to make it seem “serious” when in reality they are just bought up by other banks who are all owned by the same cabal! It’s not a big loss to close one bank when you own all the rest that buy up their assets dirt cheap.

    Mitch

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *