Skip to main content

California’s new budget: Bad for revitalizing neighborhoods

Ethan Elkind, director, Climate Program at Berkeley Law | June 28, 2011

California Governor Jerry Brown, apparently emerging from his time warp where Republicans weren’t completely radicalized against taxes and government,signed on to an all-cuts budget today, passed with majority numbers in the legislature.  His failure to get any of the four Republican votes he had sought means no new taxes and a major victory for the super-minority party.  We all know the cuts are devastating to the state’s educational system and poor, but what about the environment?

California Governor Jerry Brown

Where did 1975 go?

Well, it’s not pretty if you believe in revitalizing downtowns and building more housing in existing urban areas.  A big portion of his cuts came from the elimination of the state’s redevelopment agencies, as Rick and I blogged about previously.  Redevelopment agencies raise money by issuing bonds backed by future increases in property taxes in a given blighted area.  The increases, theoretically, should come from improved values from the invested bond money in that area.  Sure, there have been abuses (that golf course in Palm Desert probably wasn’t the best use of public funds to eliminate blight).  But redevelopment money has been critical for infill development, which is often very costly to build in blighted areas, given neighborhood opposition, higher construction costs, and challenges attracting investment to moribund areas.  Without these funds, many infill developers will go belly up, and the state will lose a critical opportunity to revitalize downtowns, bring about local economic development, and provide much needed housing in walkable areas close to jobs.  Oh well.

But never fear: this being California, a lawsuit should be filed any minute by redevelopment advocates seeking to declare the elimination of these agencies unconstitutional. Thanks to the state’s voters approving Proposition 22 in 2010, redevelopment agencies believe that any attempt by the state to eliminate them and take their cash for the state’s general fund represents an unconstitutional money grab. The governor, in turn, believes that once the agencies are eliminated, there is no such thing as redevelopment funds — it’s just property tax revenue. In any case, we can watch this battle play out in the courts, while legislative deal-making will likely continue on the side. Either way, it’s unlikely the governor will have the $1.7 billion in redevelopment money right away.

But I have an idea.  If the legislature needs to make up that money elsewhere, I can think of a few legislative districts in the eastern portion of the state that don’t contribute much tax revenue and don’t seem to want government services very badly.  Next time, let’s start there instead.

Cross-posted from the environmental law and policy blog Legal Planet, a Berkeley Law/UCLA Law collaboration.

Comments to “California’s new budget: Bad for revitalizing neighborhoods

  1. Let me get this straight (sometimes i am not as bright as the rest of you):

    – the Koch brothers made california one of the highest tax states
    – the Koch brothers made california one of the most regulated states
    – the Koch brothers made california one of the top welfare dispencaries
    – the top 20% of earners pay 80% of all taxes, and lower 40% pay ZERO(and probably get welfare)

    and 40% of all students don’t have basic skills, even after 40 years of ‘liberal’ education management

    Okay, just so I understand.

    • Please show proof for statements: California
      *one of the highest tax states (type & percentage)
      *one of the most regulated states (type & comparison to other states)
      *one of the top welfare (corporate welfare)
      *top 20% of earners pay 80% of all taxes, and lower 40% pay ZERO(and probably get welfare)
      *40% of all students don’t have basic skills, even after 40 years of ‘liberal’ education management
      So that we can all understand.

  2. You, and far too many others who should know better, completely miss the point about the root cause of our education, climate change and other out of control social, political, economic, environmental and moral problems.

    The root cause is the current fall of American Democracy that is now controlled by the republican special interests oligarchy, such as the Koch Brothers who are so demonically greedy that they don’t give a damn about the totally unacceptable consequences they are creating for the youngest generations today by redistributing the Wealth and Power of America under their personal control.

    You really and your colleagues must focus on revolutionizing the youngest voting generations to restore American Democracy and education because the out of control climate changes we are experiencing today are reaching the point of no return within the next few decades.

    Today, we have no leaders with integrity who are able to overcome the oligarchy. Either support President Obama today or learn to live your final decades out in a HAZMAT suit.

    • Governor Brown is not living up to expectations when he signed a budget with more cuts and no increase of revenues. As a babyboomer I’m in agreement with A St John, the special interest of a few have superseded the basic civil liberties for the majority.
      ‘Civil Liberties provide an individual with specific rights such as the right to life, freedom from torture, freedom from slavery and forced labor, the right to liberty and security, right to a fair trial, the right to defend one’s self, the right to privacy, freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and association.’
      And, the Koch Brothers support Wisconsin’s Governor Walker whose Budget Repair Bill passed this week, which is not about saving money but is about abolishing collective bargaining rights for public union workers.

Comments are closed.