Skip to main content

Going green and growing jobs, the right way

Carol Zabin, research director, Center for Labor Research & Education | March 26, 2013

It’s time for California, long a leader in green energy investment, to take another big step forward on the environment and job creation.

When Californians passed Proposition 39 last year, they voted for more carbon reduction, school improvements and jobs – all through a five-year, $2.5 billion program using revenues from newly closed tax loopholes to pay for investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy. Now state policymakers are making critical decisions as they craft the guidelines for this massive new investment.

39aSchool facilities are the primary target of Proposition 39 retrofitting efforts. But if the measure is going to deliver on its promises of carbon reduction, healthier schools and neighborhoods, long-term career opportunities and a timely economic boost for communities that need it the most, the proposition needs to be implemented right.

I’ve been studying the green jobs sector since its early days, and my research and observations suggest some important recommendations.

First, spend the bulk of funding on job-creating energy retrofits, and match training investments to the number of jobs that trainees can actually be placed in. This will avoid the problem of some previous green jobs programs, where jobs projections were overly optimistic and graduates of training programs could not be placed in jobs.

Second, require strong qualifications for the contractors who participate in the retrofits alongside strong skill standards for their workers. Standards will insure high quality work and send clear signals to workers and training institutions about what skills employers will look for.

Third, fund entry-level training programs that are linked to proven, highly effective state-approved apprenticeships. Since about two-thirds of Proposition 39 jobs will be in the construction trades occupations, linkage with apprenticeship programs creates real job pipelines into middle-class, skilled construction careers. Apprenticeship trains workers in broad occupational skills that allow them to learn the latest new technologies as needed. It also provides wage increases as workers acquire skills.

Finally, employ existing infrastructure and partnerships to boost both the training and the retrofit programs. California has already developed great programs and partnerships that can be leveraged for Prop. 39 work.

These elements are all found in the most successful job training programs in the green and clean-energy sectors. I recently co-authored a study of one such program, the Utility Pre-Craft Trainee program operated by the nation’s largest public utility, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 18.

This innovative program seeks to bring new people into the utility field at a time when 40 percent of LADWP’s workforce is at or near retirement age and shortages exist in key occupations. The program trains new workers for long-term careers, while initially putting them to work improving the energy efficiency of homes, businesses, and schools.

LADWP and IBEW Local 18 recognize that today’s green tech jobs are updated versions of older, traditional jobs in the building trades. The program’s trainees become familiar with specialized tasks and new technologies specific to energy efficiency work, but the foundation of their training is a broad education in traditional trades and utility work. As a result, the program doesn’t turn out workers narrowly prepared for specific roles in a currently hot field, but instead produces well-rounded workers well on their way to filling the utility’s workforce needs for the next generation.

For their part, the department and union are dedicated to supporting these aspiring workers from their initial training into career-ladder jobs. Program leaders are building on a long tradition of successful training and apprenticeships in the trades, adapted to UPCT’s unique context and goals. Trainees are paid a livable wage with health benefits from the start, part of an investment in what the department and union hope will be a pipeline into careers at the utility.

The final key to the UPCT program’s success is the deep involvement of stakeholders from all sides in partnerships that truly meet the needs of employer and worker alike. RePower LA, a coalition of community, labor, and environmental stakeholders, has been intimately involved in the development and implementation of the program. The coalition brought together residents, LADWP leadership, and elected officials around shared interests in order to help build political support to launch the program. Coalition members are also helping to connect low-income communities to weatherization services and job opportunities.

As they showed with their ballots, Californians strongly believe in the potential in energy-efficiency programs to improve our environment and economy. The UPCT program offers a good model. If we heed its lessons with Proposition 39, we will be on the right path to a cleaner state and a healthier economy, with more Californians at work and on the path to good careers.

Carol Zabin chairs the Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy at UC Berkeley.

Comments to “Going green and growing jobs, the right way

  1. It is great to hear that we finally realize how important green jobs are. We have to start thinking about saving more energy. It is a great opportunity for handymen to get more skilled. Electricians must be qualified enough to help people find out how to save energy and reduce their bills.

  2. I’m very interested in green energy and I’m busy to start my own business in Green Cells for roofs. A very interesting article! Also a nice project to start in this economic crisis.

  3. At some point the nation’s leaders are going to accept the following simple formula (killing two birds at once) for combating the twin dragons of rising sea level (which is devastating our tunnels and shore line) and the unemployment morass and lack of economic growth in our current liquidity trap.

    Proposed: LOWER by as much as 6% THE COST TO BUSINESS OF ALL LABOR IN THE U.S. by replacing and covering (dollar for dollar) the employer contribution to Social Security with an energy tax on carbon dioxide emissions. The net tax cost to society would be zero, with the significant promise of a needed upward correction in GDP and employment and consumer consumption growth and a 6% competitive improvement in the cost of American labor in the world market.

    With fossil fuel consumption in the $2 trillion range and the employer Social Security contribution in the half trillion dollar range, a 25% annual levy on fossil fuels would suffice. The cost of the tax to society will undoubtedly be offset by the increasing supply of cheap natural gas now coming on line.

    This would provide an economic umbrella that would spur a bonanza of growth and invention in the non polluting energy realm. We desperately need a “Fix the Growth” movement now, which will automatically and permanently “Fix the Debt” very promptly. It’s simple.

  4. Going green and growing jobs, the right way. The article is really great and good. I am reading all time for preparation to job opportunity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *